What does the concept of "retribution" argue regarding criminal punishment?

Disable ads (and more) with a membership for a one time $4.99 payment

Prepare for the UCF CJL3510 Prosecution and Adjudication Exam with comprehensive study guides. Explore legal concepts through flashcards and MCQs. Ace your final exam!

The concept of "retribution" in the context of criminal punishment centers on the idea that the punishment for a crime should be proportionate to the severity of the offense committed. This principle asserts that individuals who violate the law deserve to receive a punishment that reflects the moral outrage associated with their actions. The notion of "an eye for an eye" epitomizes this perspective, suggesting that justice is served when the punishment corresponds directly to the harm caused by the crime.

Retribution is grounded in the belief that punishment is justified not only as a means of consequence for actions taken but also as a societal response to uphold moral order and justice. Thus, the evaluation of punishment through the lens of severity aligns with the retributive philosophy, emphasizing fairness and the need for accountability among offenders in a structured legal system.