What does the principle of retribution emphasize in the context of punishment?

The principle of retribution centers on the idea that punishment should be proportionate to the severity and nature of the crime committed. This approach emphasizes a moral response to wrongdoing, where the focus is not on preventing future crimes or reforming the offender, but rather on delivering a punishment that reflects the harm caused by the offense. In this view, justice is achieved when the punishment is commensurate with the crime, ensuring that the offender is held accountable for their actions.

Retribution is grounded in the belief that violating societal rules warrants a corresponding sanction, as it upholds the moral order and reinforces the notion that individuals are responsible for their behavior. This perspective contrasts with other punitive approaches, such as those centered on the deterrence of future crime, long-term imprisonment as a means of isolating offenders, or restorative practices aimed at healing both the victim and the offender. By understanding retribution in this way, one can appreciate how it shapes sentencing practices and discussions about justice within the legal framework.