What is commonly referred to as the merit selection of judges?

Disable ads (and more) with a membership for a one time $4.99 payment

Prepare for the UCF CJL3510 Prosecution and Adjudication Exam with comprehensive study guides. Explore legal concepts through flashcards and MCQs. Ace your final exam!

The merit selection of judges is prominently known as the Missouri Bar Plan. This process was developed in the early 20th century and is designed to reduce political influence in the judicial appointment process. Under this model, a nonpartisan commission evaluates judicial candidates based on their qualifications, experience, and merit. After the commission assesses these candidates, it recommends a list of finalists to the governor, who then selects a judge from that list.

The implementation of the Missouri Bar Plan aims to create a more qualified judiciary and foster public confidence in the judicial system by minimizing patronage and political considerations typically involved in judicial appointments. Once a judge is appointed through this method, they often face retention elections where voters decide whether to keep that judge in office after a certain period.

This approach contrasts with other selection methods that may allow for greater political influence or partisan considerations. For example, states that utilize partisan elections or other selection methods may not prioritize the qualifications of a candidate in the same way that the Missouri Bar Plan does.