Which U.S. Supreme Court case held that police must inform suspects of their rights prior to custodial interrogation?

Disable ads (and more) with a membership for a one time $4.99 payment

Prepare for the UCF CJL3510 Prosecution and Adjudication Exam with comprehensive study guides. Explore legal concepts through flashcards and MCQs. Ace your final exam!

The U.S. Supreme Court case that established the requirement for police to inform suspects of their rights prior to custodial interrogation is Miranda v. Arizona. This landmark decision clarified the rights of individuals in police custody, specifically addressing the need for law enforcement to inform suspects of their rights to remain silent and to have an attorney present during questioning.

The ruling was based on the Fifth Amendment protection against self-incrimination and aimed to safeguard individuals from coercive interrogation practices. The decision has since led to the well-known "Miranda warning," which is a standard recitation of rights that law enforcement officers provide to suspects when making an arrest. This case has significant implications for the criminal justice system, ensuring that individuals are aware of their rights and can make informed decisions regarding their participation in interrogations.

Understanding the impact of Miranda v. Arizona is crucial for comprehending the interplay between law enforcement procedures and the constitutional rights of suspects in the U.S. legal system.